Main FAQ Search Groups Members List Profile Private Messages
Log-in Register
 
NightBlueTeam Forum Index
The Washington Post and The Wall Street Journal

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    NightBlueTeam Forum Index -> NightBlueTeam Clan
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
cheapbag214s




Joined: 27 Jun 2013
Posts: 18472
Read: 0 topics

Warns: 0/5
Location: England

PostPosted: Fri 13:16, 22 Nov 2013    Post subject: The Washington Post and The Wall Street Journal

U.S. outlines cyberattack rules of engagement
WASHINGTON, Feb. 4 () -- U.S. President Barack Obama has wide powers to order both pre-emptive and retaliatory cyberattacks against enemies, a secret legal review found.The review was conducted as part of the administration's efforts to define rules of engagement for cyberattacks, much the same as it has done in creating rules governing drone strikes,[url=http://www.trueireligion.com]True Religion Sale[/url], officials told The New York Times Monday. Nearly all of the cyberattack capabilities would need to be ordered directly by the president, though some could be carried out by the military -- such as using a cyberattack to disarm a nation's anti-aircraft weapons prior to an American airstrike. The legal review comes as several prominent U.S. newspapers and private companies have been the target of cyberattacks and hacking,[url=http://www.trueireligion.com]True Religion Jeans Outlet[/url], including the Times, The Washington Post and The Wall Street Journal, all of which were the target of attacks emanating from China.The United States is only known to have initiated a pre-emptive cyberattack once, when it inserted destructive computer code into machines operating nuclear reactors in Iran. The attack's planning began under President George W. Bush but Obama took over management of the operation and eventually gave his approval to deployment of the cyberattack, in conjunction with Israel. Administration officials said Obama was specific in that he ordered the cyberattack be narrowly focused, only targeting Iran's nuclear facility and not larger infrastructure such as power grids or hospitals.Such larger attacks are possible, however. Given the mass impact such an attack could have on civilian populations, much like overwhelming airstrikes or a ground invasion, the administration saw a need to clarify just how and when such military Internet operations could be deployed.


The post has been approved 0 times
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    NightBlueTeam Forum Index -> NightBlueTeam Clan All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


fora.pl - załóż własne forum dyskusyjne za darmo
xeon Template © Digital-Delusion
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
Regulamin